Statisticians at the University of Washington have developed the first model for projecting population that factors in the vagaries of migration, a slippery issue that has bedeviled demographers for decades.
Their work, published this week in theProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, also provides population projections for all countries worldwide — and challenges the existing predictions for some, particularly the United States and Germany.
“It turns out that for quite a few countries, migration is the single biggest source of uncertainty for population projections,” said principal investigator Adrian Raftery, a UW professor of statistics and sociology.
U Washington notes that for the first time, the researchers used a “probabilistic” model that draws on migration rates in each country and worldwide over the past sixty-five years, along with patterns of fertility and mortality, to project population around the world. The findings were most striking for Germany, whose bureau of statistics has called population decline “inevitable” as the country’s populace ages.
But the UW model predicts that when migration is factored in, Germany’s population decline could be offset by the arrival of more than one million immigrants every five years for most of the next century. The data in the study was collected before the influx of more than 965,000 migrants and refugees into the country in 2015, so the near-term difference could be even more dramatic.
“Our model could change the perception of the future of Germany from a country that goes into decline for the rest of the century to one that may not, if its policy of accepting migrants continues,” said Raftery, also a faculty affiliate for the UW Center for Statistics and the Social Sciences and the UW Center for Studies in Demography and Ecology.
The researchers also predict that France and the United Kingdom are likely to have bigger populations than Germany by 2060, given both countries’ higher fertility rates.
They also predict that the U.S. population has a 10 percent chance of exceeding 610 million over the next eighty-five years — nearly double the current population — when migration is factored in, versus a projected high of 510 million if it is not. While that likelihood is small, it has large ramifications, said lead author Jonathan Azose, a doctoral student in theUW Department of Statistics.
“If you think about planning for social welfare programs, sometimes the biggest issues arise when these unexpected events occur,” he said. “Countries need to be prepared for the possibility.”
But migration is a difficult force to predict, driven by factors ranging from war to economic crises, employment opportunity, family dynamics and even migration policy, which can themselves be difficult — if not impossible — to foresee. To come up with their projections, the researchers looked at past migration patterns in each country to determine a range of probability for future outcomes, reasoning that recent history creates an environment that is likely to create similar migration patterns going forward.
“A lot of the influences that have produced migration levels in the recent past are baked in and likely to continue to play a role in the future,” Raftery said. “It’s almost impossible to tease out all factors, but using current levels of migration, this is the best we can do.”
The researchers then incorporated global migration patterns to build a statistical model and make population projections for each country. Some regional patterns emerged. Smaller European countries that have experienced broad swings in migration over the past half-century are more likely to be impacted by migration uncertainty than countries like India and China, where migration rates are smaller relative to their large populations.
In some African countries, including the Democratic Republic of Congo, migration uncertainty is expected to be less of a factor in population change than fluctuations in mortality and fertility rates. And projections were adjusted for Gulf countries that in past decades have had large influxes of oil industry workers, since in-migration is expected to decline as the sector cools off in that region.
The researchers’ model contrasts with the traditional “deterministic” approach that projects current mortality, fertility and migration rates into the future to estimate population size. But migration rates vary considerably in many countries and fluctuate over time, Raftery said, making for unreliable estimates.
Leaving migration out of the equation can lead to long-term challenges for nations in planning for social programs, the researchers said. Many European countries are cutting education funding in anticipation of declines in school-aged populations, Azose said, which could lead to school closures and fewer trained teachers.
“If the school-age population turns out to be larger than the space allocated for them, there can be huge costs associated with opening or reopening schools and finding teachers to staff them,” he said. “International migration, and especially refugee migration, typically includes large numbers of school-aged children.”
The new research stems from a collaboration between Raftery and his colleagues and the United Nations Population Division that started ten years ago. The team was enlisted by the U.N. to incorporate uncertainty about fertility and mortality to develop more accurate population prediction models. But migration remained a critical, and unaccounted for, determinant. Raftery hopes the new model may eventually be incorporated into U.N. projections.
“Including migration uncertainty in population projections could make a substantial difference in how we understand population changes,” he said. “As far as we know, nobody has done this before.”
— Read more in Jonathan J. Azose et al., “Probabilistic population projections with migration uncertainty,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (19 January 2016). DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1606119113